← Iran War Today

U.S.-Iran Peace Talks Shift to Mediated Format Amid Sharp Gaps Over Hormuz and Lebanon

Negotiators pivot to mediated formats and written drafts as President Trump maintains a hardline stance on the Strait of Hormuz.

April 12, 2026 at 12:30 AM

Negotiations between the United States and Iran in Islamabad have entered a tactical pivot, moving from direct trilateral discussions to separate bilateral meetings mediated by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. Expert teams from both nations are currently exchanging written drafts focused on resolving the ongoing regional conflict. Despite the shift in format, significant gaps remain regarding control of the Strait of Hormuz and Israeli military operations in Lebanon. Iran continues to demand a cessation of strikes on its regional allies and oversight of the strait, while the U.S. maintains a 15-point plan requiring nuclear restrictions and the guaranteed reopening of international shipping lanes. President Donald Trump has maintained a forceful rhetorical stance, declaring that Iranian officials are in a weak negotiating position and have been 'defeated militarily.' Trump asserted that the Strait of Hormuz would be reopened 'with or without' Iranian consent, accusing Tehran of using the waterway for 'extortion.' Vice President J.D. Vance echoed this sentiment, expressed optimism for a deal but warned that the U.S. negotiating team would not be misled by Iranian tactics. Meanwhile, Iranian military officials have countered with warnings of a 'firm and decisive response' to any unauthorized military vessel transits in the strait. Regional tensions continue to complicate the diplomatic efforts. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has explicitly vowed to continue strikes against Iran's 'terror regime' and its proxies, specifically targeting Hezbollah in Lebanon despite Iranian demands for a Beirut ceasefire as a precondition for progress. While the United Nations has urged both parties to seize this 'rare chance for lasting peace' to stabilize global energy markets, the persistence of proxy conflicts and disagreements over maritime sovereignty suggests a challenging path forward for the ongoing consultations in Pakistan.

Key Points

Sources