U.S. Public and Experts Warn of Economic Toll Amid Fragile Iran Ceasefire

Following the implementation of a fragile ceasefire, President Trump faces intensifying domestic criticism over the economic consequences of the U.S.-Iran conflict. Reports from across the country indicate a growing public outcry regarding soaring gas prices and energy disruptions caused by the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll reveals that 60% of Americans now oppose U.S. strikes on Iran, with significant partisan splits: 74% of Republicans support the actions compared to only 7% of Democrats. Academic and political analysts are also questioning the long-term viability of the current U.S. strategy. Political scientist John Mearsheimer noted that Iran holds a "strategic hand" due to its ability to threaten global oil supplies, suggesting that current U.S. policy may be "playing a losing hand." Mearsheimer further highlighted that regional pressures, including Houthi demands for sanctions relief and U.S. base withdrawals, continue to bolster Tehran's position despite recent military engagements. While no new military escalations were reported in the last 24 hours, the focus has shifted entirely to the societal and economic repercussions of the war. Critics have specifically targeted the Trump administration's decision-making process, alleging a lack of congressional approval and excessive influence from regional allies, even as diplomatic talks are slated to continue in Islamabad.